According to findings published in the journal Nature, 100% of the unconscious, brain-injured patients who showed a responseto a “sniff test” regained consciousness during the four-year study. The scientists who developed the technique think that this simple, inexpensive test can aid doctors in accurately diagnosing and determining treatment protocolsthat will accurately reflect the patients’ degree of brain injury. Theysay this method works because the olfactory system is the most ancient part of the brain, soassessing its integrity provides an accurate measure of overall brain integrity.
One of the hardestdecisions for physicians treating unresponsive patients is determining whether the person is at all conscious or unconscious:Current diagnostic tests can lead to an incorrect diagnosis in up to 40% of cases. “Misdiagnosis can be critical.It can even influence the decision of whether to disconnect patients from life support,” says Dr. AnatArzi, who led the research. “And if physiciansdeem a patient completelyunconscious and insensitive, they may not prescribe painkillers for other injuries.” Arzi commenced this research during her doctoral studies in the group of Prof. Noam Sobel of the Weizmann Institute of Science’s Neurobiology Department and continued it as part of her postdoctoral research at the University of Cambridge’s Department of Psychology.
The “consciousness test” developed by the researchers – in collaboration with Dr. Yaron Sacher, Head of the Department of Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation at Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital – is based on the understandingthat our nasal airflow changes in response to odor; for example, an unpleasant odor produces shorter, shallower sniffs. Sobel’s research and others has shown that inhealthy humans, the sniff-response occurs unconsciously in wakefulness and even in sleep.
The study was conducted with43 brain-injured patients in the Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital. The researchers briefly placed tubesofvarious odorants under the patients’ noses, some emitting a pleasant scent like shampoo, others an unpleasant smell of rotten fish, and for comparison, some withno odor at all. At the same time, the scientists precisely measured the volume of air inhaled through the nose as each odor was presented. This was repeated several times in random order, and over several sessions. “Astonishingly, all ofthe patients who were classified as being in a ‘vegetative state,’ yet responded to the sniff test, later regained consciousness, even if only minimally. In some cases, the result of the sniff test was the first sign that these patients were about to recover consciousness – and this reaction was observed days, weeks and even months prior to any other signs,” says Arzi. The researchers found that the sniff response not only predicted who would regain consciousness, it also predicted — with about 92% accuracy — who would survive for at least three years.
“The fact that the sniff test is simple and inexpensive makes it advantageous,” explains Arzi. “It can be performed at the patients’ bedside without the need to move them – and without complicated machinery.”
Disorders of Consciousness
Comatose states may follow severe head injuries;patients’ eyes are closed and they do not have sleep-wake cycles. Generally after about two weeks,there may either be a rapid improvement and return to consciousness, deterioration leading to death, or in some cases, it continues to present as one of the vaguely defined “disorders of consciousness.” Those diagnosed as being in a vegetative state may open their eyes, but give no evidence they are aware of their surroundings. If there are consistent signs of awareness, the patient will be classified as being in a “minimally conscious state.” The gold standard diagnostic tool for assessing the level of consciousness the Coma Recovery Scale (Revised), based on responses to visual and aural stimuli and pain, but not smell.
Misdiagnosis frequently occurs, even when the test is conducted repeatedly. “In a well-known study, a patient in a ‘vegetative state’ was scanned with MRI and asked by researchers to imagine that she was playing tennis.Her brain activity was similar to the brain activity of healthy people playing a mental tennis game. Suddenly, they realized: She hears us and is responding to our requests. She simply has no way of communicating’,” says Arzi. “There are other, similar stories, and the challenge is to identify those patients that, while appearing unresponsive, are, indeed, conscious. The sniff test we have developed may provide a simple tool to tackle this challenge.”
Prof. Noam Sobel is head of the Azrieli National Institute for Human Brain Imaging and Research; his research is supported by the Norman and Helen Asher Center for Human Brain Imaging; the Nadia Jaglom Laboratory for the Research in the Neurobiology of Olfaction; the Adelis Foundation; and the Rob and Cheryl McEwen Fund for Brain Research. Prof. Sobel is the incumbent of the Sara and Michael Sela Professorial Chair of Neurobiology.
